griffonage
Jul. 14th, 2017 01:24 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
From the French griffoner, 'to scribble or scrawl,' griffonage is a pretty word for terrible handwriting.
How much writing do you still do "by hand"? Print or cursive?
handwriting sample: Edna St Vincent Millay
From the French griffoner, 'to scribble or scrawl,' griffonage is a pretty word for terrible handwriting.
How much writing do you still do "by hand"? Print or cursive?
handwriting sample: Edna St Vincent Millay
no subject
Date: 14/07/2017 06:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 14/07/2017 06:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 14/07/2017 07:35 pm (UTC)I don't think I'd go so far as to call it griffonage though.
no subject
Date: 16/07/2017 02:31 pm (UTC)I've read a lot of writers (Mary Oliver is the only one I can think of right now, but I know I've read others, too) who insist that writing by hand is the only way to properly write anything, and that typing is, I guess, unnatural and not as good for your thinking or creating, and I always think, "Really?" I don't want that to be true. Writing by hand is painful for my wild little brain.
My handwriting is more cursive than print. Printing has always felt too slow for me. I wouldn't say it's terrible (in the griffonage sense), but (as you know!) it is often criticized for being too small - which it definitely is. But it's always just been mine, you know? There was a time where I actually started to study calligraphy books to see if there was a way I could make my writing bigger but still feel like it belonged to me. I'm not sure if I was successful, but it was fun to play with (and I learned a weird amount about calligraphy in the process). I try to write larger now, but it still doesn't feel natural.